 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Next: 4.11 Astrometric Uncertainties
Up: 4. Calibration and Performance
 Previous: 4.9 Ghosts and Straylight
 
4.10 Field of View Distortion 
  ISOCAM images suffer from a field distortion caused by optical 
  elements like the field mirror, filter and lens. Each of these 
  elements acts in a different way and to a different extent. The 
  inclination of the Fabry field mirror causes a trapezoidal 
  deformation observed in the distortion pattern. This effect is 
  reproduced in a simple first order optical computation. Pincushion 
  distortion occurs when the beam passes through the lens and is caused 
  by the aspherical aberration of the lens. In this case, first order 
  computation is not sufficient to account for the effect. The width of 
  the filter plates contribute also in a magnification change. As the 
  beam is converging when passing through the filter, the parallel 
  planes of the filter plates (whether inclined or not) have an 
  influence on the field pattern on the detector. An example of a field 
  distortion pattern derived from a raster observation through the 
  6
 pfov lens with the LW1 filter is shown in 
  Figure4.26.
  It is important to correct data for this instrumental effect,
  especially when making a coadded map from a raster observation and 
  also when improved astrometry is needed.
  The correction is made by means of a pair of polynomials which relate 
  the distorted two-dimensional space to a distortion-free 
  two-dimensional space.
 pfov lens with the LW1 filter is shown in 
  Figure4.26.
  It is important to correct data for this instrumental effect,
  especially when making a coadded map from a raster observation and 
  also when improved astrometry is needed.
  The correction is made by means of a pair of polynomials which relate 
  the distorted two-dimensional space to a distortion-free 
  two-dimensional space.
Figure 4.26:
 A typical field 
             distortion pattern derived from a raster observation 
             through the 6
 pfov lens with the LW1 
             filter
 pfov lens with the LW1 
             filter
|  | 
 
The distortion is weak through the 1.5
 pfov lens 
  and becomes stronger for larger pfov's. The field distortion also 
  depends on the filter. Figure 4.27 shows the 
  wavelength dependency seen in the data by means of the magnification 
  parameter derived from the linear terms of the fit polynomials.
  The field distortion correction includes polynomial coefficient sets 
  for the different filters. There are two types of coefficients. One 
  derived from measurements and the other from a ray-tracing optical 
  model which was optimised to fit the observations. Measurements on 
  real data are possible in the case of the 6
 pfov lens 
  and becomes stronger for larger pfov's. The field distortion also 
  depends on the filter. Figure 4.27 shows the 
  wavelength dependency seen in the data by means of the magnification 
  parameter derived from the linear terms of the fit polynomials.
  The field distortion correction includes polynomial coefficient sets 
  for the different filters. There are two types of coefficients. One 
  derived from measurements and the other from a ray-tracing optical 
  model which was optimised to fit the observations. Measurements on 
  real data are possible in the case of the 6
 and 12
 
   and 12
 pfov lenses. The distortion measurement through the 
  3
 
  pfov lenses. The distortion measurement through the 
  3
 pfov lens was difficult because the effect
  which had to be measured was of the order of the accuracy of 
  the point source position determination routine. The 
  distortion amplitude is even smaller through the 
  1.5
 pfov lens was difficult because the effect
  which had to be measured was of the order of the accuracy of 
  the point source position determination routine. The 
  distortion amplitude is even smaller through the 
  1.5
 lens, and is therefore impossible to measure in 
  the real data. 
  
  In CIA the distortion polynomial coefficients are available in a
  CAL-G file called `clwdisto_*.fits'.
  For the ISOCAM configurations for which no accurate measurement was 
  possible or for which no data are available, the coefficients are 
  derived from the optical model. A more detailed discussion on 
  this subject can be found in the  ISOCAM Field Distortion Report
  (Okumura 2000, [46]).
 lens, and is therefore impossible to measure in 
  the real data. 
  
  In CIA the distortion polynomial coefficients are available in a
  CAL-G file called `clwdisto_*.fits'.
  For the ISOCAM configurations for which no accurate measurement was 
  possible or for which no data are available, the coefficients are 
  derived from the optical model. A more detailed discussion on 
  this subject can be found in the  ISOCAM Field Distortion Report
  (Okumura 2000, [46]).
Figure 4.27:
 
 Scaling factor of the distortion correction polynomials with respect to the 
  detector centre.   : filters (from ghost measurements),
 : filters (from ghost measurements),
              : CVFs (from ghost measurements),
 : CVFs (from ghost measurements),  : new 
	     data sets. Solid line: filters model; dashed line: CVFs 
	     model (Okumura 2000, [46]).
 : new 
	     data sets. Solid line: filters model; dashed line: CVFs 
	     model (Okumura 2000, [46]).
|  | 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Next: 4.11 Astrometric Uncertainties
Up: 4. Calibration and Performance
 Previous: 4.9 Ghosts and Straylight
ISO Handbook Volume II (CAM), Version 2.0, SAI/1999-057/Dc